Hypotheses 2 and 3 proposed that employees in mixed-gender dyads would receive lower performance ratings than employees in same-gender dyads and that mixed-gender dyads would moderate the effects of LMX on performance ratings. We found that, in comparison to men with male supervisors, only women with male supervisors have a statistically significant difference in ratings and in fact the ratings are higher. As shown in table 3 models 1a and 1b, women with male supervisors received higher ratings on both in-role performance (? = 0.17, t = 3.26, p < .01) and ICB (? = 0.15, t = 3.04, p < .01) than that of men with male supervisors. In addition, the interaction effect of LMX and gender dyad was significant for women with a male supervisor. The coefficients for the interaction of LMX with mixed-gender dyads comprised of a male supervisor and female subordinate on ratings of in-role performance (? = ?0.15, t = ?2.50, p < .05) and ICB (? = ?0.17, t = ?2.59, p < .05) were negative and statistically significant, which suggested that the strength of the relationship between LMX and performance ratings for women with male supervisors was weaker than that for men with male supervisors.
In these activities, the partnership between LMX and gratification stays high and you may confident, and you can females that have male administrators however receive high overall performance ratings than just boys that have male executives
In order to compare the gender dyad groups to other base groups (female supervisors with female subordinates and female supervisors with male subordinates), we also conducted supplemental regression analyses, results of which are shown in Appendix 2. This analysis enables us to determine whether the differences for women with male supervisors still holds true when compared against men and women with female supervisors. The supplemental analyses indicated that women with male supervisors received significantly higher ratings of in-role performance than women ( https://datingranking.net/local-hookup/lloydminster/? = 0.12, t = 2.02, p < .05) or men (? = 0.25, t = 3.66, p < .01) with female supervisors. Women with male supervisors also received higher ratings of ICB than women (? = 0.10, t = 1.78, p < .10) or men (? = 0.16, t = 2.63, p < .05) with female supervisors. One additional finding that emerged was that men with female supervisors received significantly lower ratings on in-role performance than women with female supervisors (? = ?0.12, t = 2.07, p < .05). We also conducted supplemental analyses that indicated that the interaction effect of LMX and dyadic gender for women with male supervisors was significant in comparison to men and women with female supervisors (see Models 3a, 3b, 4a, and 4b in Appendix 2). Taken altogether, our results provided mixed support for Hypotheses 2 and 3.
Since shown from inside the data 2a and you can 2b, to possess subordinates that has a top-quality experience of its supervisor, management and using sex did not have people effect on performance critiques
Numbers 2a and 2b provide graphical representations of the connections out of LMX and you will dyad gender for the studies off staff member when you look at the-part efficiency and you may ICB. Since the development of your own communication consequences based in the analyses is actually comparable across the regression designs-which is, the new telecommunications identity anywhere between LMX and you will dyad sex for women which have male executives notably linked to abilities when compared with guys that have men executives and group that have girls administrators-is parsimonious we spot only the marginal consequences towards connections away from LMX with male supervisor and you can women subordinate facing one to own men supervisor and you may male under into the evaluations out of within the-role show and you will ICB. Put simply, high-LMX employees acquired high end ratings regardless of whether or not they were when you look at the a mixed- otherwise same-gender dyad. But this was untrue for low-LMX personnel. In the event the dating high quality is reasonable, women which have a masculine management acquired high in the-role abilities and ICB choices critiques than just boys having a male supervisor.